Page 4 of 4

Posted: Mar 25th 2003, 8:41 pm
by TomSpeed
Shocking news :!:

Posted: Apr 25th 2003, 3:59 am
by Natasha (candygirl)
Okay, I just saw Sarah on Jimmy Kimmel's show - she is doing the rounds to promote her Playboy spread. Her mom must be so proud.

She is still pretty bitter about the whole thing (as Jamie Kennedy pointed out for anyone who was too dim to notice). She also claimed that she and Melissa "figured out" that Evan wasn't a millionaire before he told her the truth. Riiiiiggghhhhttt. And that's why she ran into the woods with him, totally drunk & trying to ditch the camera crew. Heh, just thinking about the "slurp" subtitles still cracks me up!

Anyway, she was sporting a short skirt and a femullet - her overall ensemble caused my boyfriend to ask "WTF?" when she walked out.

Best moment during the interview: Jimmy showing a clip from one of her bondage films.

:lol:

Posted: Apr 25th 2003, 9:11 am
by Megs
I don't like Jimmy Kimmel at all, but at times like this, I wish our cable company here in the DC area carried his show. But they don't.

I would've loved to witness the femullet and the bondage clip. :lol:

Posted: Apr 25th 2003, 9:50 am
by TomSpeed
Jimmy's show is on ABC after Nightline. Check your local listings.

Posted: Apr 25th 2003, 9:51 am
by Megs
TomSpeed wrote:Jimmy's show is on ABC after Nightline. Check your local listings.
It's not on our local network here, TomSpeed.

Posted: Apr 25th 2003, 9:54 am
by TomSpeed
Megs wrote:
TomSpeed wrote:Jimmy's show is on ABC after Nightline. Check your local listings.
It's not on our local network here, TomSpeed.
Some stations don't carry it. I guess your ABC affiliate is one of those that decided to pass on Jimmy. You mentioned the cable company, so I wasn't sure you knew it was on ABC.

Posted: Apr 25th 2003, 12:56 pm
by K-man
Yeah....Sarah is pretty much totally worthless. I wish 'Joe' would have chosen here so we could have seen her shreik and run out of the room when he admits he is not rich.

Posted: Apr 29th 2003, 8:02 pm
by Natasha (candygirl)
You can see a picture of the Playboy cover here (no nudity) - interesting tidbit from the accompanying article is that Sarah was a women's studies major and she only agreed to do the shoot if it didn't involve full frontal nudity. Because only exploiting a woman's boobies is A-OK? It's okay as long as you don't show cooter!

I don't want to get into a whole debate over women as sexual objects and the role that the media plays, but it strikes me as very hypocritical for a women's studies major to bare herself for money. Don't get me wrong - women's bodies are beautiful and I have no problem with skin, but Sarah made a big deal about being "classy" while she was on the show and now she's posing for Playboy. Her hypocrisy is what I have an issue with.

She was paid $500,000 - the same amount as Zora got (except Zora didn't have to put out or get naked).

:D

Posted: Apr 29th 2003, 10:56 pm
by TomSpeed
Well, Playboy is the classiest skin mag. I've been a proud subscriber since 1986, which was when I turned 18. It will be a very different story if she appears in Hustler.

Posted: Apr 30th 2003, 12:10 am
by Natasha (candygirl)
Hey, Maxim is classy too - they don't even show nipples!

:wink:

No, I agree - Playboy really DOES have good articles (it ain't just a rumor).

At least Playboy doesn't have any of those bent over shots next to the centerfold's claims that she loves to teach Sunday school.

:lol:

Posted: Apr 30th 2003, 11:07 am
by fnordboy
candygirl wrote:Because only exploiting a woman's boobies is A-OK? It's okay as long as you don't show cooter!
lol...cooter
candygirl wrote:..., but Sarah made a big deal about being "classy" while she was on the show and now she's posing for Playboy. Her hypocrisy is what I have an issue with.
She could have talked all she wanted about being classy on the show, but I have two words:

slurrrp. mmm.

She isn't classy, never was.

What I fin dmost interesting is that she was a Women's Studies major while she was making foot porn and bondage flicks :lol: