MSCL.com

If you're a Bush supporter, you might not think this is funny...
http://www.letspaniclater.com/

Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles 1991 Anti-Drug PSA

Sort of a Television Without Pity style review of an incredibly lame public service ad starring the "Heroes on the Half-Shell".

At this point, the PSA loses all sense of reality. Billy, in typical drug dealer fashion, begins pantomiming a chicken to illustrate what a little sissy boy Joey's being. Now I'm no authority on urban culture, nor have I hit the kind of dire straights people who deal with dealers on a daily basis usually fall into. But, I've known my fair share of 'em, and I don't think I've ever seen a single drug dealer imitate a chicken when I didn't want to try their stuff. Billy's definitely part of a new breed of pressure salesmen.

Ok, it might take me a year to stop laughing from that one. Good find Nostradamus!!

That chicken link is eerily compelling. I had to resist the temptation to command it to ponder the meaning of life or find a cure for cancer...

Nostradamus wrote:Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles 1991 Anti-Drug PSA

Sort of a Television Without Pity style review of an incredibly lame public service ad starring the "Heroes on the Half-Shell".

At this point, the PSA loses all sense of reality. Billy, in typical drug dealer fashion, begins pantomiming a chicken to illustrate what a little sissy boy Joey's being. Now I'm no authority on urban culture, nor have I hit the kind of dire straights people who deal with dealers on a daily basis usually fall into. But, I've known my fair share of 'em, and I don't think I've ever seen a single drug dealer imitate a chicken when I didn't want to try their stuff. Billy's definitely part of a new breed of pressure salesmen.

LMAO. I needed that laugh.

Nostradamus wrote:That chicken link is eerily compelling. I had to resist the temptation to command it to ponder the meaning of life or find a cure for cancer...

I know. LOL. The chicken quite a character.

Ok, this is crazy. Read quickly because it moves FAST.

http://www.elchulo.net/files/pentagon.swf

Scary stuff...

An old favorite of mine:

The Dangers of Bread

Just one of many shocking facts:

Bread has been proven to absorb water. Since the human body is more than 90 percent water, it follows that eating bread could lead to your body being taken over by this absorptive food product, turning you into a soggy, gooey bread-pudding person.

Jody Barsch* wrote:Ok, this is crazy. Read quickly because it moves FAST.

http://www.elchulo.net/files/pentagon.swf

Interesting. I`m still wondering where they think the passengers who died on the Boeing went though if they never crashed into the pentagon.

MyLifeIsBrians wrote:

Jody Barsch* wrote:Ok, this is crazy. Read quickly because it moves FAST.

http://www.elchulo.net/files/pentagon.swf

Interesting. I`m still wondering where they think the passengers who died on the Boeing went though if they never crashed into the pentagon.

There was a programme about this on the tv the other day, which mentioned that the theory is that the passengers were supposedly whisked off and all given false identities and are now under witness protection/in prison (or whatever). Personally I find it more plausible that they just crashed the plane into the sea and everyone was killed.

I am by no means a conspiracy theorist but the programme by C4 asked some very interesting questions and backed them up with documentation and testimony from some important people. That said, the theory of the missile hitting the pentagon was debunked, though not entirely successfully IMHO.

That is amazing. I feel like we are all such sheep right now. As an engineer I know a bit about how aircraft are built and how they come apart on impact. The damage and wreckage do not seem consistant with what I have seen. There is one thing that this crash does not have in common with most airplane crashes though. This plane would have hit the building at the highest possible speed, where most crashes occur at low speeds as they attempt a landing. Meaning there is considerable more energy involved. I wonder what some of my professors that specialize in aviation would say. If I get an opportunity I will show this to them. I can say one thing for sure, we do not have all the information.

If it was a conspiracy of some type, all the passengers who were on that plane are dead, murdered by the conspirators. There's no way that the conspirators would run the risk of putting witnesses in a protection program or in jail.

Some time before 9/11 I saw a documentary on the testing of a new reinforced structure; I think it was going to be used at nuclear reactors, military installations, etc. One of the tests simulated a direct hit by a crashing aircraft. They rigged a large jet engine on a ground level rail track and stuck a rocket on the back for extra acceleration. They said they didn't need a fuselage because it was almost irrelevant in a crash; the bulk of a plane's weight, and hence damage, was in the engine/s.

TomSpeed wrote:If it was a conspiracy of some type, all the passengers who were on that plane are dead, murdered by the conspirators. There's no way that the conspirators would run the risk of putting witnesses in a protection program or in jail.

This is my thinking too.