AU is producing the bonus disc themselves??????
Posted: Oct 8th 2002, 9:29 pm
Deep in another thread, Jason finally got fed up with AU and posted the following (I've quoted all of it here because it's too important)
I've been making my own VCDs and SVCDs for over a year now and have just started looking at making DVDs. In all that time, I've learned that authoring a disc is a very complex process. I make pretty good discs, but I've been at it for over a year, and I'm STILL LEARNING things.
There's so many ways to screw up a disc. Without a professionally calibrated studio NTSC monitor, they'll never get the whitepoint and color balance right. This means that for some of you, the disc will be too dark or too light, and the colors will be off. Not drastically, but enough to be noticable (and distracting)
Encoding is easy to do, unless you want to get it right. The pros "ride the controls" i.e., they tweak the compression paramters on a scene-by-scene basis. This is necessary to ensure that there are no encoding artificats in the final video. I'm not aware of any consumer level program that even supports that ability.
Do they know how to preprocess their source material? What filters should be used and how to use them? There is no set answer; it all depends on the quality of the source material. I've been at this a year and I wouldn't consider myself expereinced enough for a commercial project.
Then there's the whole authoring and testing issues. How can they ensure that the disc will work in all dvd players. Every once in a while, I make a disc that plays fine in my compter and one DVD player, but won't play at all in my other standalone DVD player. Even the professionals sometimes release a disc that doesn't work in some players. It's hard to do it right.
So, in conclusion, the lunchboxes haven't been paid for yet, and the bonus disc will be crap. What possible reason does anybody have to keep their order with AU?
A question for Jason and Ross. If AU can't find the money to pay the lunchbox manufacturer, where will they find the money to pay BMG for the discs (which is certainly alot more than $8600).
So, accoring to Jason, they're going to make the bonus disc themselves. This is unbelievably stupid.Jason Rosenfeld wrote: I agree, and I believe that it is a bit of a "last straw" backlash. I also believe that this is the tip of the iceberg.
I cannot believe the bullshit that customers put up with, that BMG put up with, that GWhizOnline (the lunchbox manufacturers) put up with. Given that much leeway from everybody, any 1/10th decent company would have taken this project and ran with it and been hugely successful.
I guess that as each new problem cropped up, and it seemed like this happened daily, I would ask myself "ok, nobody fucks things up this badly, I'm sure that things will improve."
I have to give Ross Rojek a lot of credit. If there was something that could be fucked up, his company managed to do it.
I, for one, cannot contain my rage any longer.
Doublecharges not bad enough for you? We'll triple charge people!
Then we won't respond to their emails!
Two months later, we'll still have their money!
We'll charge people up front and make vendors have to pull teeth just to get paid!
Then when we pay them, we will bounce the checks!
While everybody else is waiting for refunds or to get paid, we will be earning interest on the money in CDs!
It will be October and the lunchbox manufactuer will still be owed $8,600!
We won't just promise and miss one deadline! We'll promise 3 and miss them all!
Instead of using a good company to burn the bonus disc, we'll have Justin, our web master, do it, so we can save a few bucks!





I've been making my own VCDs and SVCDs for over a year now and have just started looking at making DVDs. In all that time, I've learned that authoring a disc is a very complex process. I make pretty good discs, but I've been at it for over a year, and I'm STILL LEARNING things.
There's so many ways to screw up a disc. Without a professionally calibrated studio NTSC monitor, they'll never get the whitepoint and color balance right. This means that for some of you, the disc will be too dark or too light, and the colors will be off. Not drastically, but enough to be noticable (and distracting)
Encoding is easy to do, unless you want to get it right. The pros "ride the controls" i.e., they tweak the compression paramters on a scene-by-scene basis. This is necessary to ensure that there are no encoding artificats in the final video. I'm not aware of any consumer level program that even supports that ability.
Do they know how to preprocess their source material? What filters should be used and how to use them? There is no set answer; it all depends on the quality of the source material. I've been at this a year and I wouldn't consider myself expereinced enough for a commercial project.
Then there's the whole authoring and testing issues. How can they ensure that the disc will work in all dvd players. Every once in a while, I make a disc that plays fine in my compter and one DVD player, but won't play at all in my other standalone DVD player. Even the professionals sometimes release a disc that doesn't work in some players. It's hard to do it right.
So, in conclusion, the lunchboxes haven't been paid for yet, and the bonus disc will be crap. What possible reason does anybody have to keep their order with AU?
A question for Jason and Ross. If AU can't find the money to pay the lunchbox manufacturer, where will they find the money to pay BMG for the discs (which is certainly alot more than $8600).